CF755A PolandBall and Hypothesis

PolandBall is a young, clever Ball. He is interested in prime numbers. He has stated a following hypothesis: "There exists such a positive integer $ n $ that for each positive integer $ m $ number $ n·m+1 $ is a prime number". Unfortunately, PolandBall is not experienced yet and doesn't know that his hypothesis is incorrect. Could you prove it wrong? Write a program that finds a counterexample for any $ n $ .

The only number in the input is $ n $ ( $ 1

Output such $ m $ that $ n·m+1 $ is not a prime number. Your answer will be considered correct if you output any suitable $ m $ such that $ 1

A prime number (or a prime) is a natural number greater than $ 1 $ that has no positive divisors other than $ 1 $ and itself. For the first sample testcase, $ 3·1+1=4 $ . We can output $ 1 $ . In the second sample testcase, $ 4·1+1=5 $ . We cannot output $ 1 $ because $ 5 $ is prime. However, $ m=2 $ is okay since $ 4·2+1=9 $ , which is not a prime number.